Archive

Archive for the ‘FutureofMedia’ Category

Tests de Nielsen du jour au lendemain en ligne audimat avec ABC, CBS, Discovery, NBC | TechZone500.com

May 5, 2013 2 comments

Tests de Nielsen du jour au lendemain en ligne audimat avec ABC, CBS, Discovery, NBC | TechZone500.com.

Challenging comScore dans les affaires de cotes de vidéo en ligne, Nielsen a déclaré mardi qu’il testera les mesures des émissions de télévision qui sont lus en ligne grâce à un programme pilote qui comprend Discovery Communications (Nasdaq : DISCA), A & E réseaux, ABC, AOL, CBS (NYSE: CBS), Univision, NBC, Fox et The CW

l’entreprise cotes dit il va générer des rapports pendant la nuit pour ses cotes Nielsen de programme numérique qui ressemblent aux rapports qu’elle produit pour l’audimat. Le pilote, qui s’étend de mai à juillet, va générer des rapports qui comprennent des données sur le nombre de flux, public et atteint par âge et sexe, dit Nielsen. Il est en tournage pour un lancement commercial du nouveau produit cotes plus tard cette année, a ajouté la société.

la participation au projet pilote de discovery est remarquable car le programmeur de câble a résisté à la distribution des émissions de télévision pleine longueur pour Discovery Channel, Animal Planet et autres réseaux par le biais de sites Web. Aussi, il n’offre pas des épisodes complets dans les applications pour smartphones et tablettes. Cependant, CEO David Zaslav a dit analystes sur un appel de gains en février que Discovery était proche de frapper sa première TV Everywhere distribution traite de distributeurs TV payante.

Nielsen, a déclaré les notes de programme numérique utilisent une méthodologie similaire à celle utilisée dans son service en ligne notes de campagne, qui évalue l’efficacité des campagnes publicitaires en ligne. Alors que le programme pilote permettra de mesurer uniquement des émissions de TV qui sont considérée en ligne, Nielsen a dit il prévoit de mesurer « les types de contenu supplémentaires et dispositifs » dans de futures versions.

articles connexes : découverte yeux première TV Everywhere transport dealsNielsen, tremblements de fournir aux annonceurs une mesure simple de la télévision et en ligne videoNielsen pour développer la collecte de données de placer-dessus en 2012Nielsen s’engage à acheter Arbitron pour 1,26 $ billionComScore lance un service de mesure multiplateforme

Categories: CIM, FutureofMedia, TV Tags: , , , , , , ,

Why Digital Marketing should replace KPIs with EPIs

May 5, 2013 1 comment

Why Digital Marketing should replace KPIs with EPIs.

This is a guest post by Stephan Argent - a member of the Marketing FIRST Forum, the global consulting collective co-founded by TrinityP3

Marketers have long shared their Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) with their agencies as a measure that helps define direction and success in business or marketing efforts. But even today, we rarely see comprehensive digital metrics as part of the KPI list.

Why?

My guess is marketing teams are still struggling to define what to look at that would be really meaningful when it comes to “digital” KPIs.  And after closer scrutiny, initial entries – such as Facebook likes – get the chop before the first draft.  (And so they should – I think Facebook dislikes would be a more useful measure of what’s working and what’s not…)

The Digital World

So, what’s a marketer to do?  And what (digital) KPIs should marketers look at when evaluating agency performance?

Instead of KPIs, I’d like to propose “EPIs” or Engagement, Performance and Influence as metrics for digital success.

Engagement in my view should be the holy grail of digital effectiveness. I’m not as wound up as others on the concept of a “like” – I’d rather see longer time spent on my site or with my content.

Performance is ultimately what we should focus on.  Whatever your broader business goals are.

And influence is the reality of the new, socially connected planet which we share.

Unlike KPIs, each of these areas needs to work together and be looked at holistically in order to be truly effective.  Here are five examples of each as a reference point:

Engagement 

1.     Activity.  Consider the activity on your digital properties. Number of Emails / enquiries / new leads – even complaints.
2.     Web Traffic. Look at unique visitors / returning visitors / number of pages per visit
3.     Engagement.  How long are your customers engaged on your site – what’s their interaction with your social media properties?
4.     Analytics suite.  What does your analytics suite look like?  How effective is it at capturing a range of metrics that give you a holistic picture of your digital properties?
5.     Source of digital engagement.  Where are your enquiries coming from? Which properties – can you delineate between mobile and web?

Performance

1.     Sales / basket / order size attributed to your digital properties
2.     Year over year or month over month performance
3.     Cost per click / sale
4.     Number of inbound e mails / calls
5.     Response rates from online advertising / promotional activity

Influence

1.     Number of positive / negative conversations – how are they tracking over time?
2.     Search ranking, share of search – call it findability if you like
3.     How many sources of recommendations do you have for your business?
4.     How many negative sources are there out there?
5.     What / how many external links are there linking to your business?  Are they good or bad?

So while this is a general list and areas of Engagement, Performance and Influence will vary from business to business, the point is to hone the myriad of potential measures into an orderly snapshot of what makes sense for your business – from a digital perspective.

Whether briefing agencies, challenging agencies or indeed searching for new agencies, consider capturing and evaluating your own EPIs for better results – and better results from your agency.

 

Categories: Big Data, FutureofMedia, KPI Tags: ,

The Future Of Advertising Is Facial Recognition – Business Insider

April 28, 2013 Leave a comment

The Future Of Advertising Is Facial Recognition – Business Insider.

If Rana el Kaliouby has her way, you will never have to channel surf again. Affectiva, the company that el Kaliouby founded with MIT colleague Rosalind Picard, develops technology that reads minute facial expressions to measure emotion. A television equipped with a webcam and Affectiva’s technology could determine which shows you like to watch, given your past emotional reactions to them, and program your television accordingly.

Affectiva’s facial-reading software, Affdex, is already being used by major advertisers, including Unilever and Coca-Cola, that previously depended on focus groups and surveys to test ads. The problem with the old approach? It requires people to self-report their reactions. Affdex is more scientific. It records viewers as they watch ads on their computers and uses an algorithm to analyze subtle facial cues, drawing from a database of more than 283 million facial frames. Then it adds viewers’ moment-to-moment reactions to a timeline for the ad, so companies can see precisely which segments might need tweaking. Affdex also determines if each viewer’s overall reaction was positive or negative.

Since its launch in 2011, Affdex has helped measure audience sentiments for several high-profile events, including the 2012 U.S. presidential debates and this year’s Super Bowl. The technology has spread globally, too: Affectiva’s algorithm now includes data from viewers in 35 countries. Its ability to detect cultural differences in audience reactions has proved especially valuable to advertisers, says el Kaliouby, Affectiva’s chief technology officer. For instance, when one company tested an ad in Brazil, it found an enthusiastic reception in one region of the country and a lackluster response in another. “If they find these things out earlier, advertisers can save millions of dollars,” el Kaliouby says.

Originally, Affectiva’s technology was developed for a far different purpose. El Kaliouby and Picard, an MIT professor and Affectiva’s chief scientist, were developing a device that could respond to users’ emotions, with the aim of helping autistic children communicate better. They realized that companies and researchers could benefit from the technology. In 2009, MIT’s Media Lab spun off the project into a separate company. That year, David Berman, formerly the president of WebEx, joined as CEO.

Since then, Affectiva has grown in large part by signing partnerships with market research companies, including Millward Brown and InsightExpress, both of which offer Affdex to customers. It has raised $21 million from investors, including Kleiner Perkins and WPP.

Eventually, Berman says, the technology could be used to test websites for ease of use or become a more scientific version of Facebook‘s Like button. In the next two years, Berman envisions Affdex becoming a complement to “smart” televisions that can understand people’s preferences. “If my wife and I both like to watch the same show, it will fine-tune the algorithm,” he says. “It puts the emotion back into viewing.”

Read more: http://www.inc.com/audacious-companies/april-joyner/affectiva.html#ixzz2RmESsZIM

Speed Summary: FT 2013 Special Report on Digital and Social Media Marketing | Social Commerce Today

April 27, 2013 1 comment

Speed Summary: FT 2013 Special Report on Digital and Social Media Marketing | Social Commerce Today.

FT

Here’s a speed summary of the just-published Financial Times 2013 special report on Digital & Social Media Marketing (PDF (FT subscribers only)).

It’s a long report, published in tandem with today’s FT Digital Media conference in London, but we’ve summarised it down to key bullet points for you.  And if that’s too long, here’s the one word summary.

Television.

From ‘second screen’ TV experiences on tablets that boost TV advertising effectiveness to ‘addressable advertising’ (personalised and hyper targeted TV ads delivered digitally) and the shrinking of TV ad slots to fit digital attention spans, the FT paints the future of Digital & Social Media Marketing with television, not instead of it.

So standing atop the $205bn TV advertising mountain is the smartest place to be in digital and social media marketing right now; this makes sense – the secret to success has always been, and always will be, to stand next to the money.

Advertisers look for ways to follow consumers Emily Steel

  • The big change in digital marketing is not that marketers have shifted nearly a fifth of their budgets to digital outlets, but that the divide between digital and traditional media is so blurred it may soon disappear.
  • Rather than threaten the $205bn television ad business, digital promises to grow it, by helping advertisers understand the messages that will best resonate with a target audience, target the right ad to the right person at the right time, and make it easy for people to share those messages with their social networks, catapulting the brand to the centre of digital chatter.
  • Whilst social media has now found its place in the world of digitally enhanced marketing as a strategic insight and targeting tool, mobile media has yet to find its niche; mobile is expected to capture more than 20 per cent of media consumption in the next five years, yet it receives only a minuscule portion of total advertising revenues, and a glut of mobile advertising inventory is causing mobile ad rates to plummet

Media: Watching television no longer rates as passive pastime Andrew Edgecliffe-Johnson

  • The average American still spends about five hours a day glued to TV; the smart money in digital is being invested in making TV advertising better
  • TV is not dead, it is just evolving into a two screen experience, the TV display and a tablet or smartphone.  “Lean-back” TV experiences, passively consumed from the comfort of the couch, are giving way to ”lean-in” TV experiences, where viewers multitask viewing and interacting on smartphones and tablets
  •  A survey by Time Warner’s Medialab found that 65 per cent habitually multitask with a digital device while watching TV. Much of this activity is in social media discussions of TV shows (tripled in the last 12 months), stimulated by TV networks to sell TV advertising space by showing their content is more engaging
  • “I have no interest, frankly, in just growing the successes of Twitter and Facebook,”  says Philip Bourchier O’Ferrall, senior vice-president of Viacom International Media Networks: “My number one role … is to drive TV ratings.” To this Nielsen’s SocialGuide found that an 8.4 per cent increase in Twitter volume correlated to a 1 per cent rise in ratings for new shows among viewers aged 18 to 34. But for 35- to 49-year-olds, however, it took a 14 per cent jump in tweets to produce the same 1 per cent ratings bump.
  • The rise of second screening is spawning a new generation of specialist second-screen agencies, creating content, data and tools to support the new twin-screen TV advertising industry. Viggle offers loyalty rewards to fans who “check into” shows, GetGlue, a social TV app developer has 3m users who have checked into, rated or reviewed 500m shows, and Bluefin Labs and SocialGuide, purchased by Twitter and TV metrics giant Nielsen respectively, analyse social TV chatter.

Online video: Web of creativity means greater opportunities to boost sales Matthew Garrahan

  • The big idea is “addressable advertising“, a fancy name for online ad targeting, and the big opportunity is to turn TV advertising into addressable advertising, using personal data to get the right ad in front of the right person. DirecTV and Dish Network, two satellite operators, and Hulu are already with online addressable TV advertising
  • As TV and video consumption moves online, there has been an explosion of professional content to wrap advertising around.  Rapidly expanding audiences are only doing so much to ease the downward trend of advertising CPM (cost per thousand impressions) rates. Down 15% from 2011, eMarketer expects video CPMs to fall a further 30% from  $45 in 2010 to $31.20 in the next four years.
  • With more much more content funded only by a little more advertising money (up from $4bn in 2013 to $8bn by 2016), the future will belong to content producers who can produce premium quality original content that consistently attract eyeballs

Networking apps: Agencies scramble to find the next big thing Tim Bradshaw

  • Advertisers should focus on trends that lie behind technology, not the technology itself – whether geeky and gimmicky Google Glass or popular networking apps (video, image, chat and data sharing).
  • It may be better for advertisers to use Instagram-style posters with comment-style tag-lines in traditional media than to run an Instagram campaign.  Likewise it may be better to shorten TV ads, from the 30-second sport to a 6-second Vine-length video than to run a campaign on Vine itself. “Five seconds is the right length” for a TV ad today say TV ad man Trevor Beattie
  • The challenge is to make advertising fit new media expectations set by trends digital; this means becoming masters of short, snappy visual content.
  • The opportunity to create trans-media advertising adapted to digital trends.  For example, advertising content from Starbucks, Nike, MTV and Forever 21 is created to be sharable on networking apps such as Instagram. Meanwhile,leave Google Glass to the geeks.

Privacy: Data industry scrutinised over profiling Emily Steel

  • Global data brokers such as Acxiom and Datalogix are coming under scrutiny from authorities as they amass consumer data and use it to improve marketing ROI
  • Axciom, that collects information about more than 700m people across the world and sells that information to more than 7,000 clients, uses credit card transaction data, primary research, geographic information and other demographic details to improve as targeting and can triple the return on investment of ad campaigns, and boost targeted consumer spending by 50%
  • Facebook has integrated Datalogix data into its ad offer, allowing brands to buy ads targeted at people based on their spending habits, for example, people who spend three times more than the national average on children’s cereal. Advertisers can then can tap the Datalogix data to figure out whether or not people who saw the ad end up visiting the store and buying the advertised product.
  • Although lawmakers may sympathise with consumer privacy advocates who fear a world where the tracking, collection and selling of personal information creates a so-called “database of ruin” of past financial, sexual, and medical follies/woes, they is a conflict of interests. Politicians deploy the same tracking, analytics, personalisation and targeting technologies as corporations in their election campaigns.

Future of search: Keyword-driven system requires refinement Richard Waters

  • Although Google search remains the undisputed king of online advertising, traditional keyword-driven search advertising is set to evolve, with Facebook and Amazon poised to move in
  • The future of search is hyper-targeted advertising based not only on search terms, but Amazon / credit card purchase data, Facebook personal data, and mobile location data.

Smartphones: Canny advertisers target your mobile phone Robert Cookson

  • After a slow start, mobile advertising is taking off; in the UK, mobile advertising spend more than doubled in 2012 to more than £500m, and in the US, mobile ad spending has become the fastest growing among all media categories as smartphone ownership surged past 50%.
  • Nevertheless mobile advertising only represents less than 3 per cent of total ad spend across all media, and currently there is more mobile ad space available than advertising to fill it, resulting in average ad rates (cost per thousand impressions) slumping to well below $1.
  • One of the reasons for the slow ramping of mobile advertising is that it has been stuck in a search and display ad rut, serving canned text, static images or dumb videos.  The opportunity is to reinvent mobile advertising with immersive rich-media interactive features. Nuance, a US company that develops speech recognition technology, this month launched a product that allows advertisers to create ads that respond to a user’s voice. And Blismedia recently bought up ad space on smartphones near ad agency offices with an interactive ad that used the gesture control functionality of handsets
  • The future potential of mobile advertising lies not only in getting the right message to the right person at the right place at the right time, but in improving the advertising experience.

Real-time marketing: Instant response requires cultural change by brand owners Rob Budden

  • The future of marketing is agile marketing, responsive and reactive creative that responds in real time to events with interesting content.  This meanscreating creative in minutes, not monthsCoca-cola has committed to doing doing 30 per cent of its marketing in an agile way.
  • In agile marketing, time is everything; similar creative placed just hours apart can have vastly different results.  Mondelez (makers of Oreos cookies) and Motel 6 were both quick to create content around this year’s Super Bowl power cut, and both with similar content.  Mondelez took minutes, Motel 6 took hours.  Mondelez’ content was shared more than 15,000 times, Motel 6 less than 30 times.
  • Agile marketing requires a mind-shift from brands, brands can no longer get away with telling consumers they are interesting when they want to tell them, they have to be interesting when consumers want to listen

People: Struggle to stay on top of a moveable feast April Dembosky

  • A talent war is raging between advertising agencies and tech companies, both are looking for technical talent and marketing strategists – ideally in the same person.
  • But what’s required in terms of technical talent and strategic planning is a fast-moving moveable feast, understanding the role of search in the marketing mix used to be key, then it was social media, then apps, and now user experience.
  • The talent war is making recruitment difficult, especially for ad agencies who find the allure of the ad exec lifestyle waning. Young talent want to be part of the change, not the old guard, and have a mission to change the world, whilst working in a flat non-hierarchical organisation (with share options).
  • Ad agencies are having to adapt and reposition themselves by abandoning the language and corporate paraphernalia of traditional advertising; Aegis media have gone so far as to jettison the terms ‘advertising’ and ‘consumers’

Social network: Facebook measures up for marketers Emily Steel

  • Facebook has spent the last year reinventing itself to become more attractive to advertisers and to transform itself from “just being a social media conversation… to being an indispensable media partner”. Ads are now far more prominent in users’ newsfeeds, especially on mobile devices, targeting is better, and advertising metrics have been improved.
  • And it looks like it is working; a year after announcing that it would stop announced it would stop buying Facebook ads because of questions over what returns the ads generated, General Motors is back testing Facebook’s new targeting and measurement offerings for a mobile ad campaign promoting its Chevrolet Sonic sedan.
  • Developments in Facebook ads have helped Unilever understand how Facebook ads lift sales, spurring big promotions such as a recent campaign in Brazil for Seda hair products. Unilever designed a campaign with mobile ads featuring a soap opera actress. The company credits the campaign with boosting market share.
  • Overall, advertisers are expected to spend more than $5.6bn on Facebook advertising this year, up more than 31 per cent from $4.3bn in 2012, according to eMarketer. On mobile alone, Facebook is expected to earn $1.5bn this year, more than three times the $471m it earned in 2012.

chart-8chart-3chart-4chart-5chart-6chart-7chart-1chart-2

Second screening is here. Are you making the most of it? | Econsultancy

February 23, 2013 1 comment

Second screening is here. Are you making the most of it? | Econsultancy.

The use of mobile devices while watching TV is on the rise and with this increase in ‘second screening’ has come an opportunity for marketers to expand their TV ad campaigns to mobile.

TV ads are an effective medium for marketing, but once the ad is over, it’s up to the viewer to remember it and do something about it.

Shazam, the sound recognition app, is one service which is helping brands to extend the reach of their TV advertsthrough mobile and therefore harness the power of second screening.

Shazam originally started as a music identification tool, which steered users to iTunes when they held their mobile device next to a song to find out what it was. Now, Shazam has broadened their offering by noticing the potential of what they can do with television.

As well as listening to music, the app now also listens to the audio from advertisements and uses it to launch relevant content on the user’s mobile device when it recognises the sound.

This gives marketers the opportunity to send Shazam users straight to a relevant landing page at a time when they are already engaged and ready to interact further.

A good example of sending timely and relevant mobile content to the viewer comes from the Men in Black 3 advert, which was Shazam-enabled in the US.

Viewers who Shazamed the trailer were sent straight to a landing page on their mobile device where they could purchase tickets to Men in Black 3 for a cinema nearby.

This shows hows Shazam is enabling marketers and advertisers to send viewers straight to a landing page with an immediate call-to-action. 

This method can also be used to market your mobile app or mobile website. Having the opportunity to send viewers straight to download your app or straight to mobile website will help drive traffic towards this channel if this is your main goal.

In terms of how people are using devices while watching television, Deloitteconducted a recent survey that found people are using other devices while watching television more and more.

Out of the 2,000 respondents, nearly half of all 16-24 year olds used their mobile devices to discuss what they were viewing on television, and almost a quarter (24%) of all respondents are second screening.

This is also the case in the UK, where nearly half of all tablet and smartphone owners are using their mobile devices while consuming other types of media. In April, Nielsen conducted a study of multi-screening habits across four different countries. It found that 40% of smartphone owners in the UK use their phones at least once a day while watching TV and 41% of tablet owners do the same.

Econsultancy’s recent Multi-Screen Marketer report found that, even among those respondents with just a television and computer, 52% report that it’s somewhat or very likely that they’re using another device while watching television.

With each screen added to the mix, that percentage rises, with 60% of smartphone users (three screens) and 65% of tablet owners (four screens) saying that multi-device use is the norm while watching TV.

These findings open up a huge opportunity for marketers and advertisers to connect with consumers first through television and then through their mobile devices.

In terms of how people how are interacting with Shazam, a recent US study of over 800 Shazam users found that people who used Shazam to tag an advert were three times more likely to interact with the brand through follow-up actions. These included looking at the brand’s Facebook page, visiting the website and checking out offers.

UK companies using Shazam

Cadburys & Pepsi were the first brands in the UK to use Shazam to extend their TV adverts to mobile. Both adverts aired during ITV’s Britain’s Got Talent and offered users the chance to win tickets to music festivals and to the London 2012 Opening Ceremony.

Around 50,000 viewers used the Shazam app to tag these adverts to extend their brand experience. This is a significant figure bearing in mind a lot of viewers had never seen this symbol on a television advert before, but a large amount of people still knew what to do.

Argos is a good example of how you can use Shazam to market your mobile presence. Shazam can direct users to any web page, which means users can be directed straight to a call-to-action, or any other type of page.

Argos is taking advantage of this by sending viewers who tag the advert straight to download its mobile app or to a mobile website. According to Marketing Week, mobile sales for Argos currently account for 7% of its £3.9bn total sales. By using Shazam to extend the reach of its Christmas ad, Argos hopes to encourage mobile sales over the holiday season.

Marketing through second screening is still a new concept in the UK but we can see how it is possible to drive deeper user engagement by immediately connecting to people through their mobile devices.

Once you have the user engaged, you can give depth to your televised content by sending viewers to a landing page of your choice, whether it be extra information, a prompt to download an app or an immediate call-to-action. Some brands are including their Facebook page in TV adverts, which is another way to engage viewers through second screening.

Once the viewer has seen the Facebook logo they can then go on to view the brand’s Facebook page to find more content they might be interested in. As the use mobile devices continues to increase, so will second screening.

Categories: Apple, FutureofMedia Tags: , ,

BBC – Future – Technology – Tomorrow’s world: A guide to the next 150 years

January 6, 2013 Leave a comment

BBC – Future – Technology – Tomorrow’s world: A guide to the next 150 years.

 

As we begin a new year, BBC Future has compiled 40 intriguing predictions made by scientists, politicians, journalists, bloggers and other assorted pundits in recent years about the shape of the world from 2013 to 2150.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Lalibre.be – Sites d’information payants: une question de survie

December 16, 2012 Leave a comment

Lalibre.be – Sites d’information payants: une question de survie.

BELGA

Mis en ligne le 14/12/2012

La révolution médiatique 3.0 est en marche.

Les éditeurs francophones et néerlandophones ont décidé de créer Media ID, plate-forme de payement commune, permettant aux internautes d’utiliser un même profil sur tous les sites d’informations belges a annoncé le journal De Morgen vendredi. Si chaque groupe de presse optera pour un modèle économique propre et une offre particulière, on semble bien se diriger vers la fin du tout gratuit, rapporte encore De Morgen.

Pour Denis Pierrard, General Manager chez IPM (DH-La Libre Belgique), “il s’agit tout simplement d’une évolution capitale pour l’avenir des médias. Le modèle de la publicité sur internet a montré ses limites en terme de ressources. De plus, vu la richesse de l’information présente sur nos sites, nous estimons qu’il est normal de demander aux surfeurs de payer.”

Pour le moment, les sites de La Dernière Heure et de La Libre sont toujours gratuit à 100%. Du côté de sites de SudPresse et du Soir, entre autres, un certain nombre d’articles sont déjà soumis à une système d’abonnements. “Nous avons conscience de la trop grande disparité des divers modes de paiement selon les produits proposés. C’est un frein clair à l’achat de notre offre numérique” explique Philippe Laloux, Digital Manager au Soir.

La plate-forme commune de payement en ligne pourrait se construire sur la structure de l’opérateur “Gopress”, qui gère déjà la vente en ligne des PDF des journaux flamands et francophones. Elle devrait voir le jour en septembre 2013. Entre-temps, chaque éditeur aura planché sur sa propre offre payante. “Tous les médias présents sur internet envisagent le ‘paywall’. Aux Etats-unis, 300 journaux en ligne ont déjà passé la rampe avec succès”, toujours selon Philippe Laloux.

“Les éditeurs de presse ne sont pas seuls dans ce projet. Des pourparlers sont aussi en cours avec les médias audiovisuels du nord et du sud du pays” a confirmé M. Pierrard. Du côté de Reyers, on “reconnaît que des discussions existent. Mais, la politique aujourd’hui n’est pas à l’identification des internautes et au payant” a réagi la RTBF.

The Mail, New York Times Top List Of Most-Read Newspapers Online | Fast Company

December 16, 2012 Leave a comment

The Mail, New York Times Top List Of Most-Read Newspapers Online | Fast Company.

 

Read Newspapers Online

As the fate of printed newspapers looks ever dimmer, attention swings to the online editions. Here’s the most recent rankings.

ComScore has released a new chart outlining the most-read online newspapers in the world during October 2012. The Daily Mail, Britain’s infamous tabloid (the first daily paper for the nation aimed at the lower middle class, according to Wikipedia), tops the list with its Mail Online page. It won with over 50 million unique visitors ages 15 and over. The New York Times brand came a close second with close to 49 million uniques.

Most Read Online Newspapers in the World

Britain appears in the top 10 again with the Guardian and Telegraph properties in third and sixth places. The online version of the official Chinese government newspaper, the People’s Daily, grabbed fifth place.

As the fate of printed news continues to look bad, statistics like this will be scrutinized by editors in newsrooms across the world.

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Google Comes To $6 Million Copyright Agreement With Belgian Newspapers | Fast Company

December 16, 2012 Leave a comment

Google Comes To $6 Million Copyright Agreement With Belgian Newspapers | Fast Company.

It’s a copyright fee, but not as we know it. Also, spot the Googler in the picture below (clue, he’s the one in the “creative” spectadoodles).

For over a decade it has enjoyed the fruits of its search links, but now it looks like Google is putting a bit of money old media’s way.

The firm announced this week that it is to “partner with European newspapers”–that means shovel large-ish piles of money in the direction of the beleaguered dead tree press in order to avoid a copyright levy. The deal is this: Google will advertise in zee pages of zee papers, while zee online operations of zee papers will use zee Adwords and other Googly advertising solutions. Result? An estimated $6.5 million in compensation. Zut alors!

The search engine has long been the subject of muttered grumbles in Europe over compensation for its newspapers, which have been hemorrhaging money: in October of this year, Google threatened France with the removal of all links to French media from its search engine, echoing a move by 90% of Brazilian dailies a few days earlier. France had been making noises about levying a fee for search engines which link to content.

11 Big Tech Trends You’ll See in 2013

December 7, 2012 Leave a comment

11 Big Tech Trends You’ll See in 2013.

Writing prediction pieces is a funny thing because there is really no such thing as “next year.” Time is a continuum, and the calendar is a human construct designed to help us keep organized. Things that will happen “next year” are already happening now, we may simply not take note of them until the sun rises and sets dozens and dozens of times.

So as I look to 2013, I realize that much of which I expect to see in the coming 12-to-14 months has been quietly (or not so quietly) developing for months, even years. From my point of view, it’s unlikely 2013 will contain any revolutionary or ground-breaking advancements in technology, social media or even the nexus of the two. Believe me, I want breakthroughs. But in order for them to be such, they have to be things I’ve never seen before, which means I have little chance of predicting them. Let’s be honest, I’m no Nostradamus.

On the other hand, I can tell you about the trends that will make a difference “next year.” If you’ve been paying attention you may already know what they are.

1. Second-Screen Revolution

Second Screen

Photo by Nina Frazier

Here are some stats for you:

  • More than 80% of smartphone and tablet owners use these devices while watching TV.

  • At least 25% of U.S. smartphone and tablet users use the devices while watching TV multiple times per day.

  • 51% of those who post on social media while watching TV do so to connect with others who might also be watching the same thing.

  • 24% of Facebook users report posting about the movie they’re watching (in the theater!).

In other words, the Second Screen has arrived, but the revolution awaits us. In 2013, brands, media companies and marketers are going to get far more aggressive and inventive when it comes to second-screen engagement. During a recent panel I moderated for Viacom’s integrated marketing group, Mondelez’s (a Kraft spinoff) VP of Global Media Bonin Bough reported engagement is far stronger for second-screen integrated marketing programs than for traditional online brand advertising (read “banners”).

Marketers see blood in the water, and in 2013 they will release the sharks.

This is not a bad thing, but the old days of getting the full entertainment experience on screen 1 (TV, movies) is quickly coming to an end. Companies will expect you to watch their shows and see their product pitches with smartphone in hand and tablet (still usually the iPad) on your lap.

Meanwhile, a legion of second-screen engagement enablers like Shazam,Zeebox (both of which were on my panel), Viggle and GetGlue are lining up to help you connect big-screen consumption with small-screen activities.

Their goal will be not only to enrich your viewing experience, but to also extend the consumer connection as you turn off the TV and walk out the door with your smartphone in your pocket. Twenty-four-seven entertainment and branding will be the norm in 2013, though you won’t always be aware the connection between what you saw on your first and second screen at home and what your smartphone is telling you as you pass the local Wal-Mart.

2. Big Data

Big Data

Image via iStockphoto, Nikada

Part of the solution of that puzzle will be data—whole bunches of it.

Thanks to the Internet and our ubiquitous, always-with-us and always-on smartphones, companies are capturing mountains of data about us. And 2013 is the year they finally figure out what to do with it.

One reason companies and marketers will more readily embrace big data is because they’re finally starting to trust it. The 2012 Presidential Election was a validation of data over guesswork. This may lead people to think that is that somewhat vertical (politics) set of data can be so telling, what can all the socio-demographic-geographic-activity data they’re grabbing now tell them.

In 2013, we’ll see the fruits of that data: targeted information on all channels, new discoveries that impact all walks of life based on deep data dives. We’ll have better products, sharper and more insightful predictions (on future elections, weather; basic needs like food, water, shelter and energy). We’ll also see the rise of the Data Scientist.

At this year’s Technomy in Tucson, Ariz., Annika Jiminez, senior director of Data Science at Greenplum, described the role and requirements for new Data Scientists. She explained that they have to be more than smart statisticians.

“They must have very strong programming skills and foundational statistical chops and communication skills.” That last skill will be critical because for all the support there is for the rise of Big Data, many companies still don’t get it. The Data Scientist has to be the cheerleader.

The best of these scientists will “optimize, predict, score and forecast” and, in the process, change our world.

3. End of Anonymous Trolls

Trolls

Image via iStockphoto, essem.W

There is a growing tension between what the ever-watchful eye of the Internet and its big data vacuum know about us and people’s desire to remain anonymous. I have no issue with people who seek to protect their privacy on social media (though this is a fool’s game—nothing is ever truly private on social media). But I have no love for people who use the cloak of anonymity as a shield from behind which they can toss Molotov cocktails of venom and malice into people’s lives and the public discourse.

In 2012, Reddit’s most popular and prolific troll was shoved out into the spotlight and forced to own up to the horrible things he had been curating/promoting on the so-called homepage of the web. He cried free speech—as did his supporters—but I think the message was clear: Trolls can’t hide forever. In 2013, I expect that role to slowly fade away.

There will still be people using nom de plumes, but the trend is definitely shifting toward personal branding. And it’s hard to brand, “HappyBoy46.” Digital natives who have grown up with the Internet actively seek to build personal brands and are learning some hard lessons about the persistence of embarrassing online acts in the process.

In 2013, we will see a flood of young people entering the online stage with a fresh perspective on branding on online discourse. It will not be cool to make up a fake names, use other people’s photos as your avatar, lie about who you are and anonymously attack others online. We might also call this time the Dawn of the Age of the End of Bullies. There have been too many sad stories about young people being driven to or near suicide by the callous and almost always semi-anonymous online actions of others.

In short, 2013 will be time to clean house. Watch it happen with me.

4. End of Privacy

Privacy

Image via iStockphoto, stocknshares

Concurrent with the end of anonymity will, obviously, be the end of privacy. As I noted above, people can try to keep only activities private and hide much of who they are, where they live, what they do and so on from the world, but every action they take will belie it. Constant data collection, ever-growing number of services that ask you to share something about yourself and a generation of users who don’t care about privacy will change how many of us think, feel and act about our own personal, digital space.

If you don’t believe me, just ask David Patraeus. He thought Google Gmail’s Draft folder would protect his privacy. Not so much.

In 2013, consumers will spend more time cleaning house, assuming that whatever they have posted on social media, what they consume and where they go will be public info — unless they actively seek to keep it out of the digital domain. Perhaps 2013 will see the rise of digital-jamming tools — software and hardware that acts a bit like “incognito mode” in Google Chrome. Not only can your own hardware not see where you are or what you’re doing, but third-party sensors are rendered unable to see you as well.

5. Rise of Reporting

Reporting

Image via iStockphoto, shaunl

Too many reporters and sites got burned in 2012 by re-reporting or over-trusting so-called “known sources” (Google: We Did Not Acquire ICOANASA Confirms: No Major Discovery in Curiosity’s Mars Soil Sample). More media companies will rely on their own original reporting and those on social media may hesitate for one extra second before hitting Like, share and retweet.

Expect 2013 to be filled with a lot more long reads, real investigative reporting and fewer digital mea culpas.

6. Official Death of Desktops

Desktop

Image via Flickr, Hannaford

The Window 8 launch event in New York City sticks in my mind for two reasons: 1) The amazing mirror-like setup of 200-or-so Surface tablets; and 2) The utter lack of traditional desktop computers running Windows 8. To demonstrate the new OS, Microsoft pulled together and impressive array of system. But while there were tons of laptops and tablets and even a handful of All-in-One PCs (a screen that’s also a computer), I did not see a single traditional box.

Sales of desktop computers have been steadily falling since 2006 (when the Consumer Electronics Association reported them at a high of 8.9 billion unitsin the U.S), and laptops officially surpassed desktops in 2008.

Now, however, PC sales are in an all-out tailspin. One report suggests that they won’t turn around for years (if ever). All-in-ones, like the kind I saw at the Windows 8 event, may grow a bit. But I’d say the writing is on the wall: In 2013, we will bury the box PC (at least in the U.S. consumer market) for good. Considering most of us no longer burn CDs, install software from discs, I doubt many people will miss them.

7. 3D Printing

Photo by Nina Frazier

It moved into the home and retail stories this year and will explode in 2013 as the initial $2,000 price of owning a home 3D printer tumbles.

It’s true, consumers may not yet fully understand 3D printing, but the companies they know and love surely get it. In 2012, Staples announced plans to add 3D-printing services to a handful of European outlets and will expand to other countries in short order. When consumers see a 3D printer next to tall stacks of bright-white printing paper, they may start to wonder what all the 3D hype is about.

Concurrently, there will be more and more stories of 3D printing in our everyday lives and industries: at doctors’ offices, in hospitals, even at the local auto mechanic.

In 2013, I expect to see a lot more 3D-printer hardware and services competition and possibly even the first 3D-toy printer (are you listening Hasbro?).

8. Flexible Devices

Flexible

Image via iStockphoto, klgoh

When it comes to TV, computer, tablets and phone screens, I’m pretty sure we can’t get any thinner. On the other hand, 2013 could be the year of the flexible display—and possibly flexible computer. By year’s end, we should at least see a bendable phone (hard-ish rubber body, flexible display, plastic screen cover). The only question is which company — Apple, Google, Samsung, HTC — will deliver it first.

There’s also an off chance that we’ll see the first flexible HDTV (hang it on the wall, or roll it up and move it to another room).

9. Embedded Technology

Embedded

Image via iStockphoto, Grzegorz Slemp

NFC may not have made it to the iPhone 5, and some consumers remainconfounded by it, but traditional objects with some smarts built in will happen (in fact, it already is). I predict a whole class of household products that offer instructions when you tap your NFC-enabled tablet or phone (but not your iPhone!) on them and their own embedded NFC chips.

Embedded technology will also show up where you least expect it: utility poles, door handles, sidewalks, you name it. Any place they can jam a sensor to capture — you guessed it — data, or let you quickly gain information about location, situational awareness, there will be embedded technology.

Also, 2013 might also be the year we see a lot more people get technology embedded in them. I’m on the fence, though, about just how big a trend this will be.

10. Crowdfunding Mania

Three years after Kickstarter launched, 2012 became the proving grounds for a host of new crowdfunding platforms, including Indiegogo (which actually launched in 2008), iCrowd and SmallKnot. Companiessmall businesses andindividuals are all finding success and funding, which will lead to an explosion of crowdfunding startups in 2013.

By the end of the year, the market will be saturated and returns will have diminished. I don’t think 2013 marks the end of the crowdfunding craze. But, as more people realize that you do not always get a comparable turn on investment (these are often risky, high-concept projects, after all), we will see compression by 2014.

11. Robots Rise

Robots Rise

Image via Flickr, randychiu

The consumer robotics space has been pretty quiet for the last five years, but I think that’s all about to change.

Robot wizard Rodney Brooks, whose Rethink Robotics recently unveiled the remarkable Baxter, now thinks we’ll see more powerful in-home robots in just a few years. I expect there could be a surprise or two in the home-robot-companion space, either from a company we know, like Wow Wee or iRobot, (which is doing some awesome research), Honda, Toyota. Or perhaps it will be an Asia Pacific firm we’ve never heard of.

Those are the big trends, but there are sure to be many other ones that are smaller, but just as interesting. How do you think 2013 will shape up? Share your ideas in the comments below.

Homepage Photo by Nina Frazier

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,058 other followers

%d bloggers like this: