Archive

Archive for the ‘Search’ Category

Infographie : la Longue Traîne SEO – Actualité Abondance

May 5, 2013 1 comment

Infographie : la Longue Traîne SEO – Actualité Abondance.

Une infographie qui nous propose quelques graphiques et explications sur le concept de ‘longue traîne’ (long tail), essentiel en SEO…

Notre infographie du vendredi est proposée aujourd’hui parBitRebels et nous présente un grand classique du SEO en images : les notions de “courte traîne” et “longue traîne” chères à Chris Anderson, rédacteur en chef du magazine Wired qui a pour la première fois développé cette idée en 2004. Un concept qui a par la suite été adapté au monde du SEO : définition, taille des mots clés, potentiel de positionnement et taux de conversion et de clic, bref, quelques graphiques intéressants pour mieux s’approprier ce concept essentiel en SEO  :

long-tail-seo-guide-infographic
Source de l’image : Bit Rebels
Categories: Search Tags: , ,

Making the Most Out of Search Data

March 8, 2013 Leave a comment

Making the Most Out of Search Data.

Search data is not one-size-fits-all – it goes way beyond search engine marketing and knowing which search led to a specific action. In fact, if search data can be used to forecast flu outbreaks, then I think we should consider the use cases beyond just an SEM campaign.

There are various search entities where data resides – such as search engines like Google, Bing and Yahoo!, and then other search entities including vertical sites, shopping comparison engines, e-commerce sites and social networks. The combination of all of these searches is creating opportunities for marketers to take search data beyond SEM and into other types of marketing territory.

Value Of Search Data Beyond Search Engines

Today’s search world is anything but linear. When you think about it, search has really become more organic; something that has grown into multiple elements and can be placed in a variety of contexts to provide greater insights. Marketers should start by understanding that the use of search data in SEM is different from the use of search in display.

Additionally, search data is a great source of consumer behavior and an identifying factor of where a consumer is within the purchasing funnel.FUnnelSearchKeywords

Given this sheer volume of data, it’s easy to see why search data is becoming more important for display advertisers. Today, search data allows display advertisers to reach a broader audience, proving that it’s no longer just a lower level, funnel-marketing channel for SEM advertisers.

This has evolved because in display, marketers aren’t buying keywords related to a search from a list, but an audience based on search. Rather than bidding on specific keywords; in display, you are targeting a much larger audience that is based on other related words, not just a single keyword.

For example, in search, marketers that want to target using the keyword “lawyer” will need to purchase all three related keywords: attorney, legal advice and lawyer.

In display, that same “lawyer” keyword is expanded to include related terms, and would result in an audience that includes people that search for lawyer, attorney, law advice, lawsuit, legal counsel, etc. These keywords are without an additional cost to the marketer and result in an increased reach for the campaign.SEMvsDIsplay

Search Engines + Other Search Entities = Greater Insights

As mentioned earlier, search data that is used in display advertising comes from a vast range of sites that aren’t search engines. These types of sites include e-commerce sites, vertical and shopping comparison sites and social networking sites.vertical_sites

The breadth of data available on these sites increases the likelihood that display campaigns based on search will reach consumers earlier in the purchase cycle. This allows advertisers to get their brand and message in front of those consumers during the influence/consideration phase, before they have made their purchasing decision.

The analysis of various sources of search data leads to a pool of insights into consumer trends, purchasing decisions, and the demographics of consumers that are searching for your product or related products.

For example, when you combine search with additional browsing behaviors, marketers get a much richer picture of how long a consumer may consider specific products, what factors play a role in the purchasing process, the kinds of sites that consumers who are interested in the product visit, and other, perhaps even unrelated products, your consumer audience is interested in, etc.

Understanding The Value Of Search In Display

While the search industry has had a proven model since the ’90s, it’s also true that display has created even more value for the search channel and its data. In my opinion, marketers shouldn’t overlook the value that comes, very cost-effectively, from the use of combining search data with display advertising, as many of the insights gleaned go beyond what Google and Bing have.

Search data shouldn’t be seen just as a marketing channel, or be used only for SEM; it should be seen as a major contributor to the overall digital marketing mix. Below are a few ways marketers can make the most out of search data for their display campaigns:

  1. Leverage search retargeting for search extension: Take your search keywords and work with a partner that can expand your SEM list for greater scale in display.
  2. Apply search insights to display strategy: Use search data to gain insights into consumer trends, purchasing patterns and trends, etc., refining your display campaign and targeting parameters accordingly.
  3. Use display as a method for conquesting: Search engines like Google don’t enable conquesting. By utilizing search data within display, marketers can target audiences with display ads based on competitors’ key terms.
  4. Break free from CPC pricing, while using search data: Buying each keyword in search quickly adds up, and some keywords are simply more costly than others. When you apply search data to display targeting, you place value on the audience vs. each individual keyword.
Categories: Search Tags: ,

Search vs Social Marketing

August 3, 2012 Leave a comment

 

 

Vers une convergence entre réseaux sociaux et moteurs de recherche ? – SMX 2012 – Journal du Net Solutions

June 9, 2012 Leave a comment

Vers une convergence entre réseaux sociaux et moteurs de recherche ? – SMX 2012 – Journal du Net Solutions.

“La frontière entre moteurs de recherche et réseaux sociaux va totalement s’effacer”, prédit François Sutter, directeur conseil à l’agence Modedemploi, plantant directement en préambule, le décor de la conférence ”Le search sera social ou ne sera pas“, qui s’est tenue lors de ce SMX Paris 2012.

Son argumentation s’appuie sur un constat : depuis quelques temps, il suffit que Facebook, Bing ou Google ait une initiative mêlant réseaux sociaux et SERP pour que son concurrent lui emboite le pas peu après. Et la cadence s’est accélérée. C’est particulièrement frappant depuis un an, avec l’arrivée de Google+, quelques jours après l’intégration plus poussée de Facebook dans Bing et quelques mois avant le Search Plus Your World de Google. De quoi inquiéter certains référenceurs, sceptiques sur la pertinence de la personnalisation des résultats (voir notre dossierSEO : personnalisation des résultats, Graal ou enfer ?).

“Nous avons noué des partenariats avec des réseaux sociaux plutôt que de créer le nôtre que nous aurions ensuite favorisé dans nos résultats de recherche”, a indiqué de son côté Bernard Lukey, le directeur général Europe du moteur russe Yandex. Une stratégie qui diffère donc notamment de celle adoptée par Google, qui référence particulièrement bien son réseau social, et même de la stratégie de Microsoft, actionnaire de Facebook, qui est aussi privilégié dans Bing.

de droite à gauche : bernard lukey, directeur général de yandex europe, fedor
De droite à gauche : Bernard Lukey, directeur général de Yandex Europe, Fedor Romanenko, responsable qualité recherche du moteur russe, et François Sutter, directeur conseil chez Modedemploi. ©  JDN

Ces stratégies permettent à Bing de mieux indexer et valoriser des contenus populaires sur les réseaux sociaux. Certaines actualitésbrûlantes bénéficient en effet d’un écho plus important que d’autres sur les réseaux sociaux, ce qui envoie un signal que les miteurs doivent désormais prendre en compte.

Le “Social Search” rencontre vite ses limites.

Mais le “Social Search” rencontre vite ses limites : il y a de nombreux thèmes qui ne sont pas du tout abordés sur les réseaux sociaux, ou pour lesquels ces réseaux ne sont d’aucune utilité… Mais cela ne veut pas dire pour autant qu’ils ne doivent pas apparaître dans lesSERP“, rappelle Fedor Romanenko, responsable de la qualité chez Yandex.

Ce dernier reconnaît que les internautes peuvent apprécier de voir les avis de leurs amis influencer les résultats d’une requête concernant des restaurants ou des loisirs, mais ils peuvent aussi être déçus sur d’autres thèmes. Tous les sujets ne se prêtent pas à la personnalisation des résultats par les réseaux sociaux, comme l’expliquait également récemment au JDN un haut responsable de Bing.

Mais, même si les moteurs semblent avoir conscience des limites du “Social Search”, leur intérêt pour les réseaux sociaux ne montre aujourd’hui encore aucun signe d’essoufflement, en témoigne entre autres le lancement du réseau social de Microsoft, So.cl.

Google supprime jusqu’à 250 000 liens frauduleux par semaine – Challenges.fr

May 27, 2012 1 comment

Google supprime jusqu’à 250 000 liens frauduleux par semaine – Challenges.fr.

Créé le 26-05-2012 à 07h01 - Mis à jour le 27-05-2012 à 07h03

Dans son rapport consacré à la transparence sur le fonctionnement de ses services en ligne, Google révèle faire le ménage sur plus de 250 000 URL jugées frauduleuses par semaine.

Microsoft est l’entreprise qui a formulé le plus grand nombre de demandes de suppression de liens frauduleux dans le moteur de recherche de Google au cours de l’année écoulée. C’est que nous apprend le Tansparency Report que Google met à disposition des internautes afin de les informer de la disponibilité de ses services dans le monde, mais également des demandes d’information et de suppression de contenus que lui font les gouvernements. 

Ces données publiques concernent désormais aussi les ayant droits qui réclament à Google le retrait d’url pointant vers des contenus illicites. Microsoft arrive donc en tête sur les 12 derniers mois avec 2,5 millions d’url supprimées, suivi de NBC Universal (985 995) et de la RIAA (416 731). Google dit avoir reçu le mois dernier 1,2 million de demandes de suppression d’url, ajoutant qu’il traite actuellement plus de 250 000 demandes par semaine « ce qui est plus que ce que les propriétaires de droits d’auteur nous ont demandé de supprimer en 2009 ». 

Parmi les sites les plus visés sur les 12 derniers mois, Filestube.com arrive en tête avec 40 7000 demande pour près de 390 000 url signalées, suivi de Torrentz.eu (18 300 demande et 147 000 url) et de 4shared.com (24 100 demandes 132 500 url). À noter que le site The Pirate Bay, bête noire des ayants droits, n’apparaît qu’en 44ème position sur la période avec 39 000 url signalées et un peu plus de 5 000 demandes. (EP)
La rédaction, CNET France

Categories: Google, Search Tags: ,

Search and social media marketing spend remains strong – new report | Econsultancy

May 26, 2012 Leave a comment

Search and social media marketing spend remains strong – new report | Econsultancy.

Good news @Havas Media Brussels we have focussed a consequent part of our development on Search & SoMe

“Digital marketing budgets in search engine and social media marketing are continuing to rise despite challenging economic conditions, according to research released today.

The UK Search Engine Benchmark Report, published in association with NetBooster, has for the past five years shown that companies have continuously invested in the opportunities present in SEO, paid search and social media marketing.

According to the research, based on a survey of over 300 UK in-house marketers and over 200 agency employees, nearly two-thirds of companies (62%) plan to increase their social media spending within the next 12 months, with 57% increasing spending on SEO and almost half (49%) increasing spending on paid search.

Over a third of companies (38%) are spending in excess of £100,000 on paid search advertising each year, with 12% spending similarly in SEO.

The report also found that the three most commonly cited barriers to success in paid search were the strength of competitionkeywords being too expensive, and a lack of budget, with over a third of companies citing these three challenges as some of their most significant issues.

The most commonly cited barrier to success in SEO was listed as a lack of resource, with 42% of companies stating that this was a problem. Such findings are in line with the trend towards higher cost-per-click rates and an increasing emphasis on the production of high quality, original content for SEO.

Commenting on the research, Edward Cowell, SEO Director at NetBooster said:

This year has been a period of the most rapid and interesting change we’ve seen in digital and search for a long time. I am delighted to say that the search sector is still evolving at pace, and the outlook for investment in search marketing remains positive.

Andrew Warren-Payne is a Research Analyst at Econsultancy. Follow him on Twitter or Google+


Categories: Search, Social Media Tags: , , , ,

Yahoo Axis may be game changer for search and the troubled company – Computerworld

May 25, 2012 1 comment

Yahoo Axis may be game changer for search and the troubled company – Computerworld.

Computerworld - With its new search/browser app Axis, Yahoo is trying to change the search game, while also trying to change its image as a troubled company.

Late in the day Wednesday, Yahoo launched Axis, which it’s calling a “search browser.” Axis is an HTML5-based browser app, as well as a browser plug-in, that delivers search results as images rather than as links.

The new product is aimed at making search faster and easier. Axis also makes searching more visual, an area where Google and Microsoft‘s Bing, the two major forces in the search world, are not focused.

The launch was a surprising move for a company that has not only been struggling to regain its once-prominent position in the Internet world but that also recently suffered the departure of its CEO, which placed the company in an embarrassing spotlight.

“It’s the first significant innovation, and sign of life, from Yahoo in many months,” said Dan Olds, an analyst with The Gabriel Consulting Group. “If they can pick up some users, it could really help them move forward.”

In the last month, Yahoo has been coping with a PR nightmare. Its new CEO, Scott Thompson, who took over in January, was caught with erroneous academic information on his resume, as well as in documents that the company filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The company formed a committee to look into Thompson’s background and the circumstances surrounding his hiring.

Thompson left the company May 13 and Ross Levinsohn, who had been serving as Yahoo’s head of global media, stepped in as interim CEO. It’s the second time in eight months that the company has been without a permanent CEO.

Now is the time for Yahoo to do something impressive and get users thinking about a Yahoo success instead of trouble, analysts said.

“If they can pull this off, it could help put them back on the map,” said Rob Enderle, an analyst with the Enderle Group. “I think it is the best idea I’ve seen out of them in nearly a decade.”

Yahoo saw a niche it could take advantage of and then executed on it, said Patrick Moorhead, an analyst with Moor Insights & Strategy.

“With Google owning generic and mobile search, and Bing in the position to own social search, Yahoo needed something that distinguished itself from the pack,” he said.

However, the launch of Axis could be more than a game changer just for Yahoo. It could be a gamer changer in the overall search market.

“I think the Yahoo visual search capabilities are more in line with the post-PC era,” said Zeus Kerravala, an analyst with ZK Research. “Being able to look at an image that comes up from search criteria is much faster and optimized for touch… I think it creates an alternative to Google and Bing and that itself is a threat. We’ll see how they respond, but it’s the most unique thing I’ve seen from Yahoo in a long time.”

Moorhead noted that visual search could be a problem for Google and Bing because it’s a departure from the norm. “It breaks their user models,” he added. “Yahoo can score immediate points with the fact they are even doing something unique. If Yahoo can develop a strong following with any demographic, they have won some ground.”

 covers the Internet and Web 2.0, emerging technologies, and desktop and laptop chips for Computerworld. Follow Sharon on Twitter at Twitter @sgaudin, on  or subscribe to Sharon’s RSS feed Gaudin RSS. Her email address is sgaudin@computerworld.com.

See more by Sharon Gaudin on Computerworld.com.

 

Categories: Google, Search Tags: ,

Google Search Just Got 1,000 Times Smarter

May 17, 2012 Leave a comment

Google Search Just Got 1,000 Times Smarter.

The Google Search of the future is here. Now. Today. The long-talked-about semantic web — Google prefers “Knowledge Graph” — is rolling out across all Google Search tools, and our most fundamental online task may never be the same again.

Starting today, a vast portion of Google Search results will work with you to intuit what you really meant by that search entry. Type in an ambiguous query like “Kings” (which could mean royalty, a sports team or a now-cancelled TV show), and a new window will appear on the right side of your result literally asking you which entity you meant. Click on one of those options and your results will be filtered for that search entity.

To understand the gravity of this change, you need to know about the fundamental changes going on behind the scenes at Google Search. As we outlined in our report earlier this year, Google is switching from simple keyword recognition to the identification of entities, nodes and relationships. In this world, “New York” is not simply the combination of two keywords that can be recognized. It’s understood by Google as a state in the U.S. surrounded by other states, the Atlantic Ocean and with a whole bunch of other, relevant attributes.

As Ben Gomes, Google Fellow, put it, Google is essentially switching “from strings to things.”

To build this world of things, Google is tapping a variety of knowledge databases, including Freebase, which it bought in 2010, Wikipedia, Google Local, Google Maps and Google Shopping. Currently, Google’s Knowledge Graph has over 500 million people, places and things and those things have at least 3.5 billion attributes.

That’s a lot of things. According to Google, search users will see these new knowledge graph results at least as often as they see Google Maps in results. In fact, this update will have a greater initial impact than the updates that brought Google Images, videos, news and books, combined. It’s big and it’s probably going to be everywhere.


Summaries of Good Stuff


In addition to the window which will help users find the right “thing,” Google will also surface summaries for things, which, again, will try to be somewhat comprehensive by tapping into the various databases of knowledge. A search for Frank Lloyd Wright, for instance, will return a brief summary, photos of Wright, images of his famous projects and perhaps, most interestingly, related “things.” People who search for Wright are also looking for other notable architects. It’s a feature that may remind users of Amazon’s penchant for delivering “people who liked this book also bought or searched for this one” results.

Gomes said that the search results are tailored to deliver information that best relates to the initial search result. So the details delivered about a female astronaut will likely outline her space travel record, because that’s what people who search for her are, according to Google, most interested in.

Google Knowledge Graph Example Thumbnail

How the Knowledge Graph Works. Click to see full graph example

Since this is a knowledge graph (“Web” might be a better word), the results are designed to help you dig more deeply into related topics. Google showed us how someone might start by searching for a local amusement park, find an interesting rollercoaster as one of the “things” that relates to the park and end up digging in on details about that coaster and other similar rides. It’s a “skeleton of knowledge that allows you to explore information on the web,” said Gomes.

There is the potential, Gomes added, of serendipitous discovery. The more you dig into things, the more things you learn about.

Of course, not every “thing” is the right thing. Wikipedia is, for example, a community-sourced encyclopedia that is known for both its breadth and depth of information and the occasional whoppers of misinformation it stores. Google’s Knowledge Graph includes an error reporting system. When users find misinformation, Google will share it with the source and the knowledge graph will get just a little bit smarter

For now, though, the Knowledge Graph is not getting any smarter about you. If you search for an ambiguous topic and then guide Google Search to the more defined set of results, the same query later will not go directly to that filtered information — at least not yet. “We don’t have anything to announce for personalization,” said Gomes.


The Competition


Google’s chief search competitor, Microsoft Bing, also has millions of entities, but it’s not aiming for the purely semantic model of search results. Instead, Bing execs told Mashable that it’s focusing, in part, on much smaller set of segments that its users typically search on (i.e.: restaurants, hotels, movies) and trying to surface relevant information regarding those segments. A search result for hotels, for example, might include reservation tools. And while Google search now blends in Google+ results, Bing’s latest instantiation has moved social information to the right side of its search results page

It’s unclear for now how the Google Knowledge Graph, which pushes aside keyword results in favor of relationships and artificial intelligence, impacts all the Search Engine Optimization (SEO) many web sites have done to push their search rank ever higher. Also unknown is how, if at all, Google’s sea change will impact Google+. Gomes revealed that some Google+ changes were coming “independent of this” update and that Google will be talking about them separately.

Eventually, Google’s search will get smarter and will stop asking for your help to understand your query and start answering complex questions like “What is the coldest lake in the world in July?” It doesn’t matter why you want to know that, just that, someday, the right answer will be a click away on Google Search.

Google’s Knowledge Graph will roll out across the U.S. (and on all Google platforms: desktop, mobile, tablet) in the coming days. Eventually, it will go global. Give it a try and let us know what you think of the brand new Google Search in the comments.

Categories: Google, Search Tags: , , , ,

How US Smartphone and Tablet Owners Use Their Devices for Shopping | Nielsen Wire

May 12, 2012 Leave a comment

How US Smartphone and Tablet Owners Use Their Devices for Shopping | Nielsen Wire.

May 3, 2012

According to a survey conducted by Nielsen in Q1 2012, the vast majority (79%) of US smartphone and tablet owners have used their mobile devices for shopping-related activities.  Smartphones are used more often than tablets for activities on-the-go: “Locating a store” (73% vs. 42% for tablets ), “using a shopping list while shopping” (42% vs. 16% for tablets) or “redeeming a mobile coupon” (36% vs. 11% for tablet owners).   However, tablet owners are much more likely to use their device for online shopping: 42 percent of tablet owners have “used their device to purchase an item,” compared to just 29 percent of smartphone owners.

One of the most popular activities among both smartphone owners and tablet owners is “researching an item before purchase” (66% for tablet owners vs. 57% for smartphone owners).  Comparatively few mobile shoppers have used their devices for payments (27% of smartphone owners and 28% of tablet owners), but that number is expected to rise in the years to come as more mobile payment systems roll out nationwide and U.S. consumers get more comfortable with the idea of mobile payments.

shopping-smartphones-tablet

Analyst: Mobile To Overtake PC For Local Search By 2015

April 22, 2012 Leave a comment

Analyst: Mobile To Overtake PC For Local Search By 2015.

Analyst firm BIA/Kelsey has projected that by 2015 there will be more local searches coming from smartphones than PCs  in the US. It’s a bold prediction and one that has logical merit: smartphone search volumes are growing faster than search on the PC. While local search is at least 20 percent of total queries on the PC (per Google) it’s at least 40 percent of smartphone queries, also according to Google.

Mobile vs. PC Local Search Volumes (BIA/Kelsey Forecast)

Source: BIA/Kelsey (2012)

In some categories such as restaurants and travel, mobile searches represent 15 – 20 percent or more of overall query volumes. There can be no dispute that mobile search is now a huge phenomenon. But will it eclipse PC local search query volume in three years?

Let’s think out loud a bit, shall we?

50 Billion Local Queries on the PC

Using the Google 20 percent figure as a guide we can estimate that in March there were approximately 3.7 billion local searches on the PC in the US. In the absence of significant month over month growth that would translate into roughly 44 billion annual local queries coming through US search engines on the PC. But let’s assume modest local query growth and say there will be something on the order of 50 billion local queries on search engines in the US in 2012. (The number could be higher of course.)

Now, how many local-mobile search queries are there?

Answering that question depends on whether we include app-based local search (e.g., Yelp, Foursquare, yellow pages apps, Urbanspoon, etc.). Data from comScore, Localeze and 15 Miles finds that half of US mobile consumers (survey respondents) say they use apps at least some of the time for local search. However, we don’t know the frequency or the volume of in-app search because no one is really tracking those numbers today.

Let’s limit the definition of “mobile search” to browser based search through one of the major US search engines. However right now Google represents about 95 percent of the total “mobile search” market in the US.

12 Billion Local Queries on Smartphones

If there are roughly 125 million smartphone owners in the US (50 percent of 250 million mobile subscribers) and a large number of smartphone owners do an average 20 mobile searches per month, then there are something like 30 billion mobile searches annually right now in the US. (Let’s leave out tablets of this discussion.) If 40 percent of that overall mobile search volume is local, that would mean roughly 12 billion annual local searches on mobile devices. (This number may be slightly inflated today.)

We can assume growth in smartphone penetration and some growth in per-person mobile search query volume — though this assumption is a wild card for several reasons. It also may be a bit risky to assume that the percentage of overall mobile search that is local will continue to climb significantly, though it could reach 50 percent (which is what Microsoft says it is today on Bing).

Let’s assume smartphone penetration reaches 75 percent (say 187 million people) and each person does 40 mobile searches per month (doubling our per-person monthly query assumption). That translates into 90 billion annual mobile queries. If the local percentage of mobile search volume grows to 50 percent, we’d have 45 billion annual local-mobile search queries.

That event would get us pretty close to PC-mobile local search parity, if there weren’t dramatic PC local search growth. However a number of factual assumptions must come to pass. And the future is not guaranteed to look like the past.

What If the Paradigm Shifts?

The proliferation of mobile apps (whether native or HTML5) combined with the rise of Siri and other voice assistants could mean that browser-based mobile search doesn’t grow much over time. Google has cited figures of 130 percent year over year mobile search growth. But there are reasons to believe that the current PC search model on the smartphone small screen will be supplanted, at least to some degree in the relatively near future.

More than a couple of years out it all starts to get very speculative, since mobile is evolving so rapidly. However, regardless of whether the BIA forecast comes true in three years — I don’t think it can without including in-app search volumes — it’s certainly directionally accurate. And one day in the relatively near future it’s clear that people will be using mobile devices to find local information as much or more than their laptops and desktop PCs.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,064 other followers

%d bloggers like this: